OFR7 problems

[Kevan]

Originally Posted by JJ Rodriguez

And once again I just want to say that I didn't mean it as a dig against the product, I think it's a great thing for people who want that functionality.

I know, man. It's cool.

If you need a T-No Accessory Pack (has the set screws, spacers, and extra thumbscrew), PM me and I'll get you hooked up.

[JJ Rodriguez]

Cool, I might take you up on that, but I'm kind of deciding between the T-No and a Schaller Sureclaw right now. I have 3 currently sitting in boxes that I haven't used yet I'm always changing string gauges and shit so it might be more handy. Maybe we need a T-No that will fit on a Sureclaw

[Kevan]

The Sureclaw is unofficially extinct.
I needed a few for the T-No "Tyson" body guitars that we use at trade shows for demonstrations (trem works, but no neck). I looked forever for them, even tried obscure stores and distributors. Zippo. After an exhausting search, I found and bought 3 from Australia last year (courtesy of DPM).

If you're doing constant string GAUGE changes, then the SureClaw would be the way to go.

It'd be tough to do a SureClaw/T-No combo. The SureClaw takes up a bigass portion of the spring cavity.
Maybe I'll work on something and get it ready for when their patent on the SureClaw expires.

[Max]

Originally Posted by Kevan

[s]Maybe[/s] I'll work on something and get it ready for when their patent on the SureClaw expires.

Perfect...

[JJ Rodriguez]

That'd be cool. I got ukvlt to buy 3 for me and ship them over to me when he was stationed in Germany. Speaking of him, where the fuck has he been?

It probably wouldn't be that hard to make a T-No/Sureclaw type combo, given that the trem claw for the T-No doesn't look that different from the claw that gets pulled back on the Sureclaw. I really like the Sureclaw because it gives you a lot more range to pull the claw back too in case you want to use less springs.