X2n v Super 3

[ToxicTrace]

I like the X2n, but it has a distinct lack of treble in my bass dinky. I want to grab a pickup that's still fat, but would have more treble. I was thinking the super three, as a friend has one he's not using. WHat do you guys think of this pickup?

[Kagami]

It has less treble than the X2N, don't bother with it. The X2N's EQ is pretty flat, the Super 3 is pretty bassy like the SD Invader but not quite that bassy.

[Toshiro]

What you probably want is a De-activator.

[ToxicTrace]

Originally Posted by Toshiro

What you probably want is a De-activator.

They sound fat?

[Leon]

The Norton in my LTD is pretty fat. Definitely not scooped, but not nearly as hairy as the Blaze Custom (quite middy). Way warmer than a TZ, a bit warmer than the PAF Pro.

[ToxicTrace]

What are the opinion on Evos around here?

[BenEllerGuitars]

EVO is really bright and may fulfill the lack of highs you're looking for. The SUper 2 is also really nice and bright, but might be lacking in the lows.

[Max]

Wirelessly posted (Hivemind)

Evos are not what idcall far at all

[Toshiro]

Wirelessly posted (HTC G2)

Re De-activator:

Not really, but that's the only thing I can think of with more highs than an X2N that has any mids and lows.

[ToxicTrace]

My gripe with the x2n is how 'american' it is. It seems to have a ton of low mids and bass, and I prefer a nice high mids spike with chunky lows. The fatness is amazing though, its like a sledgehammer, I just want a british sounding sledgehammer.