"You can use different sized or shaped frets for different parts of the neck." - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 17 to 21 of 21

Thread: "You can use different sized or shaped frets for different parts of the neck."

  1. #17

    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: 7th plane of ethereal hell
    ME: Ibanez UV7PWH
    Rig: VHT UL /AxeFX2 /Mesa RK2

    iTrader: 8 (100%)

    Intersting, narrower frets on the upper registers sounds pretty cool actually... I'd want to try that out and see what it's like

  2. Remove Advertisements

  3. #18

    Join Date: Apr 2013
    Location: Southern Ontario, Canada
    ME: 1984 Warlock NJ
    Rig: 6505+

    iTrader: 0

    I like the medium frets on the Jackson KV2 Select. It would be cool to play a guitar with jumbos on the first 12 and medium frets on the upper register (all properly leveled out of course).

  4. #19

    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: Virginia Beach, USA
    ME: ESP Baby Metal
    MB: ESP Horizon 5
    Rig: KR7, 5153, MKIV, UL

    iTrader: 5 (100%)

    Quote Originally Posted by jacksonplayer View Post
    Both did that, actually, along with Jackson on their Japanese Falcon model (which Itaru Kanu turned into the Horus after he left Jackson to form Caparison).

    Having frets with different heights causes problems at the point of the change. If the upper octave frets are higher, the lower ones will fret out. If the lower octave frets are higher, you won't be able to fret the first lower-level fret in tune. This was a problem on both my Jackson Falcon and on my Washburn EC36. I had a cheapo import Hamer Californian briefly which had the same feature on 25-27, but that was such a dog that the problem with playing the 25th fret was the least of my issues with it.
    Yeah it is a bit difficult to fret those even with thin strings.

  5. Remove Advertisements

  6. #20

    Join Date: Sep 2008
    Location: The house formerly known as the Haus
    ME: Ibanez S540LTD
    MA: Taylor Big Baby
    Rig: Laney GH50L

    iTrader: 13 (100%)

    Lower upper frets reminds me of shaping in a falloff when leveling frets, which is common enough, except that its a sudden change rather than gradual, which is gonna fuck up intonation/tuning at that point like oldbutprolificjazzplayer said.

    I've definitely seen a few necks 2 fret widths come through the shop when I was doing repair, mostly transitioning after the 14th fret, but I think one was at the 12th. Thinking back on it now, I didn't notice it at the time, but pretty much all of them were brought in by somewhat older guys (40-50 at the time) who got into guitar playing like, early 70s British rock/metal, and had transitioned into slightly shreddier (occasionally buttrockish) territory, nevermind the fact that it was the late 2000s/early 2010s. They had all been done 10+ years prior as well, as far as I can tell. I don't know if that was localized because those guys all went to the same tech at some point in time who recommended that when their guitars needed refrets, or if it was the hot gossip in the chase for ultimate shreddilyweddily or what.
    R.I.P. Guitars Etc
    RHLC Chief Promotions Officer

  7. #21

    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Brit in Munich, Germany
    ME: Ibanez RG 550
    MB: Sandberg Ken Taylor 5
    Rig: Diezel Herbert

    iTrader: 0

    High-end luthiers? Feline Guitars in the UK (build Blackmachines, restored Richie Faulkner's LP Custom) do this sometimes. I've seen it on several Siggi Braun builds (he's made instruments for people like Timo Tolkki, Victor Smolski, Alex Beyrodt).

    I just took shape/size to mean this sort of thing:

    This is just about fine tuning. If one needs a re-fret anyway, why not make the dusty end easier to play? My RG2011 has identical frets all the way up to the 30th, if I ever play it enough to merit a re-fret, I'd certainly consider this.

Tags for this Thread

Fractal Audio Systems  Shred Training  Angel Vivaldi
Bowes Guitarworks  NumbSkull Audio Production

VigLink badge