If by interesting things you mean, "Ugly Kiesel ripoffs", I suppose so.
It's like B.C. Rich was holding a design meeting and some guy went up to a whiteboard and was like, "What features date a guitar badly? Don't be afraid, shout out what you honestly feel"
And someone was like, "UGLY RG HORNS INSTEAD OF A REAL SUPERSTRAT SHAPE" (Since no sane person would pick an RG over a Soloist)
And someone else was like, "ABALONE BINDING"
And someone else was like, "KIESEL BURSTS"
And the dude just writes them all down on the whiteboard and is like, "EXACTLY. If we combine all these terribly dated features into a single guitar, it will be so incredibly dated that the date range in which it was fashionable never actually exited. Here's what most people don't know. "Timeless-Terribly Dated and shitty" isn't a linear continuum. It's a circle. This guitar will be so incredibly dated, the date when anybody would have actually enjoyed this guitar never actually existed, therefor there will be a stack overflow sort of thing and this will effectively become the most timeless design of all time. More timeless than the strat."
And then some guy bursts into the meeting late and is like,
"HOLD ON, IF WE'RE MAKING A TRULY TIMELESS GUITAR THIS THING BETTER HAVE AN EVERTUNE AND SOME SHITTY FISHMAN PICKUPS THAT GOT SHILLED BY THE UNEARTH GUYS AND SOME YOUTUBE CELEBRITIES"
And the dude at the whiteboard is like, "I think this company just might have found its new CEO."