Metal Guitarist Forums banner

In the name of JAAAAACKSAAAN

6464 Views 60 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  Daniel
So I'm a student who is poor and does not have a car...and I have a fucking X shaped 7 string guitar with a massive god damned case -

My B.C. Rich Stealth 7 is great, but I just prefer Jacksons and 6 strings -

so -

It's either this:



or something else.

Your job:

- Your experiences with this specific model

- tell me what you think the difference is between the SLSMG Lightweight Soloist and the SLS3 Soloist (I know what they are but I'd like a consensus).

:tmm:

Edit: Oh yeah - that means I'm selling my 7, which means I won't be a 7 string player until I get another one :lol:
See less See more
1 - 20 of 61 Posts
Do you want a Floyd? SLS3. Do you like mahogany instead of maple/alder? Get the SLSMG. It's a bit more complicated than that, but I hit the two most important points.
No experience, but I fucking LOVE those headstocks.
I :wub: my SLSMG.
Do you want a Floyd? SLS3. Do you like mahogany instead of maple/alder? Get the SLSMG. It's a bit more complicated than that, but I hit the two most important points.
You're confusing the SLS3 and the SL3 (floyded soloist), the SLS3 is almost the exact same specs as the SLSMG with different pickups and inlays.
Actually, I was thinking of the SLAT3.
Actually, I was thinking of the SLAT3.
You guys might remember my Performer PS-2 complete with a Schaller floyd. I have a guitar with a floyd so I wouldn't mind a non-floyd guitar.

If the SLSMG came with an optional floyd I'd probably get it but the simplicity of the TOM is very appealing.
You're confusing the SLS3 and the SL3 (floyded soloist), the SLS3 is almost the exact same specs as the SLSMG with different pickups and inlays.
Yeah, I'd say the those are pretty much the only differences. Also I think the SLS3 has a bone (or at least a bone coloured) nut.

I actually prefer the way the SLSMG looks, too.
Do you want a Floyd? SLS3. Do you like mahogany instead of maple/alder? Get the SLSMG. It's a bit more complicated than that, but I hit the two most important points.
I prefer Alder. The Stealth has Mahogany wings but wings don't really play too big a part in tone if your guitar is neck through maple.
So I'm a student who is poor and does not have a car...and I have a fucking X shaped 7 string guitar with a massive god damned case -

My B.C. Rich Stealth 7 is great, but I just prefer Jacksons and 6 strings -

so -

It's either this:



or something else.

Your job:

- Your experiences with this specific model

- tell me what you think the difference is between the SLSMG Lightweight Soloist and the SLS3 Soloist (I know what they are but I'd like a consensus).

:tmm:

Edit: Oh yeah - that means I'm selling my 7, which means I won't be a 7 string player until I get another one :lol:
First off if you are looking for a 7 the SLAT 7 is the only sensible Jackson to get. Unless you have enough scratch to get a used CS. If not, you have a shitload of options to look at, and knowing stuff like price range, shape preference, and tonal preference would help a lot. But heres my general opinion on a bunch of series. The good thing is that with modern prices on used Jacksons, if you can drop $1200 you can pretty much get anything on the used market. The only things that routinely go for more are more modern CSs, San Dimas guitars that are either exceptionally clean or have very desirable/rare features, Ontario guitars that are either exceptionally clean or have very desirable/rare features.

-Jackson US Production models (1990 - Present)
Hard to go wrong here. Almost everything is very good. The only thing to watch out for that is not quality on any USA model is the licensed (TRS) floyds that Jackson used on several models from the 96-98 period. Besides the shitty trem those are still USA level guitars though.

-Jackson Pros (1990-1992)
Not the "Professional" series mind you, the "Pro" models, which are the high end of that series. Includes
Soloist
King V
Rhoads
Warrior
AT
Fusion
Stealth
Collen (although a clean example of this in a desirable color might actually break the $1200 mark today )

-Other Jacksons from the Professional Series (1990-96)
Evaluate these on a model by model basis. As a general rule of thumb anything with the suffix "XL" is also very good, but usually comes with a rosewood fretboard instead of ebony. Another general rule is anything that comes with the Jt-590 stock is higher quality than something with the Jt-580 or other licensed variant. There are still good guitars below the XL series, but I wouldn't rank them on the same level. Most of the good ones are 90-92 from 93-96 these got phased out and got less and less worthwhile to own.

-Jackson Imports (96-present)
Nothing mindblowing IMO. Decent enough guitars but nothing really worth owning.

-Exceptions from the 96 to present import period
SLSMG,SLS3,Kevin Bonds,Slat 6/7

A cut above other imports. Play enough till you find a good one, as quality is variable. Neck carve is variable on the SLSMGs as well, and IMO the good (close to a standard soloist carve) one is hard to find. These come close (and match in some aspects) the level of quality from the early "Pros". Some would also put the COW in this camp, but I do not agree, haven't played a great example of one of those.

-Jackson Stars
Research these are your own as I do not know much about them. There are definitely ones worth owning though. Japanese production.

-"Grover Jackson" Guitars
Same story as above. The upper level ones certainly look to be worth owning.

-San Dimas and Ontario Guitars
Pre production American Jacksons. Where a lot of people consider the "magic" and "mojo" too be. If you have $600 to spend you can start getting into these, at least at the bolt on end of the spectrum. Evaluate on a guitar to guitar basis, certainly lots of stuff worth owning in this period. :D
See less See more
First off if you are looking for a 7 the SLAT 7 is the only sensible Jackson to get. Unless you have enough scratch to get a used CS. If not, you have a shitload of options to look at, and knowing stuff like price range, shape preference, and tonal preference would help a lot. But heres my general opinion on a bunch of series. The good thing is that with modern prices on used Jacksons, if you can drop $1200 you can pretty much get anything on the used market. The only things that routinely go for more are more modern CSs, San Dimas guitars that are either exceptionally clean or have very desirable/rare features, Ontario guitars that are either exceptionally clean or have very desirable/rare features.

-Jackson US Production models (1990 - Present)
Hard to go wrong here. Almost everything is very good. The only thing to watch out for that is not quality on any USA model is the licensed (TRS) floyds that Jackson used on several models from the 96-98 period. Besides the shitty trem those are still USA level guitars though.

-Jackson Pros (1990-1992)
Not the "Professional" series mind you, the "Pro" models, which are the high end of that series. Includes
Soloist
King V
Rhoads
Warrior
AT
Fusion
Stealth
Collen (although a clean example of this in a desirable color might actually break the $1200 mark today )

-Other Jacksons from the Professional Series (1990-96)
Evaluate these on a model by model basis. As a general rule of thumb anything with the suffix "XL" is also very good, but usually comes with a rosewood fretboard instead of ebony. Another general rule is anything that comes with the Jt-590 stock is higher quality than something with the Jt-580 or other licensed variant. There are still good guitars below the XL series, but I wouldn't rank them on the same level. Most of the good ones are 90-92 from 93-96 these got phased out and got less and less worthwhile to own.

-Jackson Imports (96-present)
Nothing mindblowing IMO. Decent enough guitars but nothing really worth owning.

-Exceptions from the 96 to present import period
SLSMG,SLS3,Kevin Bonds,Slat 6/7

A cut above other imports. Play enough till you find a good one, as quality is variable. Neck carve is variable on the SLSMGs as well, and IMO the good (close to a standard soloist carve) one is hard to find. These come close (and match in some aspects) the level of quality from the early "Pros". Some would also put the COW in this camp, but I do not agree, haven't played a great example of one of those.

-Jackson Stars
Research these are your own as I do not know much about them. There are definitely ones worth owning though. Japanese production.

-"Grover Jackson" Guitars
Same story as above. The upper level ones certainly look to be worth owning.

-San Dimas and Ontario Guitars
Pre production American Jacksons. Where a lot of people consider the "magic" and "mojo" too be. If you have $600 to spend you can start getting into these, at least at the bolt on end of the spectrum. Evaluate on a guitar to guitar basis, certainly lots of stuff worth owning in this period. :D
TL;DR You're a cock.

:wavey: It's Peter from facebook, mang.

I agree with pretty much all of this. I've never understood the appeal of the RR3's although the RR5 with OFR wouldn't be bad.

I'm pretty much completely set on the SLSMG now. I should get a boogie on and sell the Stealth before it goes out of production or something horrible like that :scream:
TL;DR You're a cock.

:wavey: It's Peter from facebook, mang.

I agree with pretty much all of this. I've never understood the appeal of the RR3's although the RR5 with OFR wouldn't be bad.

I'm pretty much completely set on the SLSMG now. I should get a boogie on and sell the Stealth before it goes out of production or something horrible like that :scream:
SLSMGs are a great choice. I prefer the older pre active models, if you decide to go active on those its not like you can't put the battery in the control cavity anyways. On a guitar thats reduced wood content anyways I prefer not having additional wood chiseled away for a battery box. Keep in mind that there are two different neck carves. Both are good, but if you like thin necks the rarer one is superior. The more common one is thicker (though not by a HUGE margin, still enough to be noticeable). I have a facebook picture of what the thin carve looks like 'neath hand, so check that out. Its closer to that standard modern soloist carve. Ask for a picture from the seller if you buy used, you should be able to tell.

Don't know if neck carve is a huge deal to you, but thats the deal anyways.
Good choice on the SLSMG, I used to own one around 2005. They are ridiculously awesome 6 stringers and play flawless. :metal:
I owned a DKMG in Satin Black when I was 16 or so...fantastic guitars. I even liked the EMG-HZ's (alright, I was only 16).
You know I totally keep forgetting I had one :lol:

Is that Garrett's?
Is that Garrett's?
No, IIRC he bought his when they were on closeout at MF for around $700, thats one of the later active models, both of mine were earlier pre active models. Mine were inferno red too though.
Used SLSMGs are one of the sickest values out there. I've played a dog or two, but I've also played some that were every bit as good as any USA Soloist.
First off if you are looking for a 7 the SLAT 7 is the only sensible Jackson to get.
Yeah, but he said in his original post that he wants a 6. :nono:
1 - 20 of 61 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top