Metal Guitarist Forums banner
1 - 7 of 7 Posts

Tr00 Kvlt
5,914 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Russia's space agency announced Wednesday that the International Space Station -- a space base the world's scientists and billions of U.S. tax dollars helped build and maintain some 200 miles above the surface of the Earth -- will be de-orbited and allowed to sink into the Pacific Ocean in 2020, just like its Russian predecessor, Mir.
"We will be forced to sink the ISS. We cannot leave it in orbit as it is a very complicated and a heavy object," Roscosmos' deputy head Vitaly Davydov said in an interview posted on the agency's website.
Related Slideshow

Inside the Orion Spacecraft
NASA's Constellation Program included Orion, a spacecraft that would return humans to the moon and prepare for future voyages to Mars. Could it be the next vehicle to hit the moon?
Lost 1967 Spaceship Found Crashed on Dark Side of Moon?
Private Spacecraft Plans Landmark Docking With International Space Station
Rare Volcanoes Discovered on 'Dark Side' of the Moon
Related Slideshow

The Moon, Our Nearest Heavenly Neighbor
As NASA eliminates its manned moon missions, we take a look through decades of incredible photos that remind us where we've been -- and won't be returning for quite a while.

"We have agreed with our partners that the ISS would function roughly until 2020," he noted.
After sinking hundreds of millions into construction of the space station -- billions if you include the cost of the space shuttle flights that carried the ISS modules into orbit -- knowledgeable government sources and NASA spokesmen were aghast at Davydov's plans to sink the station in the ocean.
This isn't the first time I've seen Russia come out with a statement that seems to be coming out of their own stovepipes," one congressional representative told "I would give it no credence at all."
"We wouldn't allow astronauts to be on the station if there's a sense that it's limping along," he added.
NASA agreed to construct the International Space Station on January 29, 1998, in conjunction with representatives from Canada, members of the European Space Agency (ESA), and Japanese and Russian space scientists. And the space agency clearly has a different vision for the station than Russia.
"The partnership is currently working to certify on-orbit elements through 2028," NASA spokesman Joshua Buck told
Buck noted that an international panel including the U.S. and Russia met in March of 2010 to evaluate the future of the space station. They identified no constraints on continuing operation through 2020 -- and at the time, emphasized their common intent to continue operation of the world's first space base into the next decade.
It was not immediately clear why Davydov made the abrupt change. Russia's space agency did not immediately respond to requests for clarification. U.S. Senator Bill Nelson, a former astronaut and a congressional expert on NASA, told the Russian comments were intended mainly to mitigate concerns about the growing issue of space junk.
"All the Russians are saying is that when the time comes to shut the station down -- whenever that is -- it will have to be brought from orbit in a planned 'crash' so there's no space junk left behind or debris that falls in populated areas."
The Roscosmos comments come a day after the U.S. space agency met with the International board managing the ISS -- the most politically complex space exploration program ever undertaken.
NASA characterized that meeting dramatically differently than Russia did, noting that potential future science projects aboard the station could support a mission to an asteroid or Mars, or assist in the development of a permanent base on the moon.
The space station represents a massive, worldwide accomplishment, spanning an area the size of a football field. It has been continuously occupied for nearly 11 years, and has travelled more than 1.5 billion miles -- the equivalent of eight round trips to the Sun -- over the course of 57,361 orbits around the Earth, NASA notes.
Deorbiting the station in 2020 simply hasn't been discussed at all, knowledgeable sources told
I have no idea where they came out with that date," a congressional source told "NASA would have advised us ahead of time if there were any agreement along those lines."
"There's a presumption that Congress and the White House fully expects ISS to be up and viable through at least 2020."
Roscosmos' plans for space after sinking the ISS were not immediately clear. Asked whether a new space station will be built, Davydov said "there are several possibilities."
Meanwhile, China moves ahead with plans for a competing space station of its own. China has an ambitious, decade-long plan beginning with the Tiangong-1 module the country plans to launch this year, which will culminate in a large space station around 2020.
During the projected one- to two-year lifetime of Tiangong-1 -- which means "Heavenly Palace" in Chinese -- an unpiloted Chinese Shenzhou-8 spacecraft will first attempt to dock with the platform, to be followed later by two piloted Shezhou missions to further hone rendezvous and docking skills, according to a report on
The Mir space station was in operation from 1983 to 1998 before being sunk in the Pacific Ocean in a "spacecraft cemetery" not far from Christmas Island in 2000.

Read more: Russia Plans to Sink the International Space Station in 2020 -

What are you looking at?
2,124 Posts
Well it's going to have to come down at some point whether we like it or not. However, I don't think Russia should be calling the shots now just because they're the only ones that can get astronauts/cosmonauts to and from the ISS. The US has the most invested in the ISS from a money standpoint and the ISS would’ve never been possible to construct without the use of the Shuttle, so I'm sure Russia can't just make this type of decision unilaterally.
1 - 7 of 7 Posts