:yesway:
I try to find any music that I feel is special on vinyl.
I try to find any music that I feel is special on vinyl.
To the Editor:
"In Mobile Age, Sound Quality Steps Back" (Business Day, May 10), about the degradation of sound quality in the MP3 era, touches on a central concern for musicians like me, who feel that a song's chief virtue should not be its ease of portability. There is an art to listening to music, and the move to jukebox-style delivery of songs in MP3 form has largely compromised that art for a generation of fans.
I remember listening to music on vinyl, poring over the sleeve, looking at the lyric sheet, even following the needle across the record.
There was something in that magical, romantic, tactile relationship with the album that has been lost by the reduction of music to content.
Music is not software; music is art. But I've been encouraged by the growing revolt against that iPod culture and playlist mentality.
Kids at shows come up to me to have me sign their vinyl.
They want to feel as if they're buying into something they can cherish and feel a part of. And you simply can't do that downloading a few files.
Steven Wilson
London, May 11, 2010
I listen to MP3s in the car since it is often easier. I buy MP3 albums from Amazon, and I try to find it on vinyl for something more substantial.I love Steven Wilson so much.
I only use an iPod for casual listening - any other time, I'm always using the original copies of it.
That's why you just get a record brush and keep dirt out of the grooves :shrug: If you let them get too dirty they'll sound like shit.Meh. I had vinyl as kid, and most of them became unplayable very quickly. I had cassette tapes as a teen that turned to shit over time. The CD was the be-all-end-all for me, and I embrace mp3(cbr320).
I still listen to albums as a whole unit, not individual tracks randomized with other music, though.
Great music is great music, period.
Still rather have a CD. :lol:That's why you just get a record brush and keep dirt out of the grooves :shrug: If you let them get too dirty they'll sound like shit.
CDs are nowhere near as cool as vinyl to me. With vinyl you get this big ass piece of artwork, and this big disc. You look at the grooves and say "Wow! That's where the music is!"
:lol: GTFO of Florida, humidity sucks!Still rather have a CD. :lol:
Keeping records in hot humid climates is not a great thing either. Warping is a bitch!
I agree with your points here, but I would also place some blame on the record companies for signing dim-witted "artists" to crank out some nonsense single to feed to the "mixtape" masses.I think the death of vinyl wasn't 100% the format itself but the shift to a "mixtape" society. The LP kinda represents an era where there was some pride in presentation and being more inclined to drink in a whole album as an experience. The advent of the "skip button" killed it from a few angles, IMO. People grew a little less patient to sit through an album from beginning to end and likewise, artists started plunking down 2 or 3 songs of substance and turning out albums with 80% filler. Now, of course there are and were exceptions to this but there was definitely a disconnect between people and viewing the "art" in music writing.
Embracing vinyl is definitely something in the direction of revitalizing the experience of listening to music, but I'd say it has more to do with the intimacy of having to track down the LP, dusting off the old record player and just listening. I'm sure there are other ways to bring that feeling and that attention back to the listenership (and as an artist myself, I'd like to know what that is) but I haven't completely solved that puzzle yet.
It saddens me, but I"m glad to see that vinyl is coming back. I am realllllly itching to take another trip to Richmond to grab a stack of dollar records. :yesway:Agreed. I probably left that part out but yeah... record companies seeking quick bucks were probably the ones that started the whole "mixtape" thing off in the first place.
:agreed: I love Steven Wilson, and resisted getting an iPod for the longest time because of the reasons he mentions.I still listen to albums as a whole unit, not individual tracks randomized with other music, though.
Great music is great music, period.
Exactly! (though my mp3 player says Nokia on the front and sometimes rings. :lol: ):agreed: I love Steven Wilson, and resisted getting an iPod for the longest time because of the reasons he mentions.
But let's face it, the problem here isn't the technology, its the user. There's absolutely no reason you can't use an iPod to play albums - you don't have to use it as a mix tape. And with 160 gigs at my disposal, I can encode albums at a high enough rate of fidelity that if there's any audio degradation, it's beyond my ability to tell on the systems I listen on. I still buy CDs because I appreciate the liner notes, the album art, and the physical medium, but when I'm at work listening to music I'm not flipping through the liner notes, so an iPod works just as well for me.
At the end of the day, music is music, the art isn't the medium as much as it is the listening, and you can use a record player just as much like a jokebox as a iPod (in fact, traditional jukeboxes DO play records). I like having an iPod because I can listen to any album I own at CD-comparable quality from a device that fits in my back pocket.
Rather, the popularity of the single, or the birth of a single as a stand-alone entity.Exactly! (though my mp3 player says Nokia on the front and sometimes rings. :lol: )
I would say the birth of the single was the death of the album. Being able to buy one song, regardless of the medium(singles came on vinyl too), paved the way for people to not care about anything that wasn't a radio hit.