I thought this was going to be something similar to the banana trem blocking system. 
What's that, you just shove a banana in there? Do you have to say "Harambe"?I thought this was going to be something similar to the banana trem blocking system.![]()
:agreed:I thought this was going to be something similar to the banana trem blocking system.![]()
:rofl:Actually managed to find the thread :lol:
http://www.metalguitarist.org/forum...33139-materials-block-floyds-restringing.html
There's a video in the credits, but if you tell me which part was unclear, I can fix the original post.Can you maybe make a video of this? I couldn't really follow the description.
Ah, missed that part. Thanks.There's a video in the credits, but if you tell me which part was unclear, I can fix the original post.
End cap nuts, 5mm.What kind of nuts do you using for spacering?
I want to try this on my basses. I have a couple of high spots on my yamaha and a couple low ones on my cirrus 6 i wanna take care of, and pleks are mad expensive.
Here are the benefits:This seems like a lot more work than the standard method, and without any actual benefit that I can see :scratch:
I'm not sure the Katana is worth it at $250, but it's does look like a better tool. This is a ghetto Katana.You could also buy a Katana. They're great tools, and they work really well.
Me too. :lol:I thought this was going to be something similar to the banana trem blocking system.![]()
Well, I have tried the standard way and ran into ALL the issues I mentioned, and I have met others who had the same experience. This is my first time with this method and the results are perfect, so I declare it superior based on a sample size of 1. :flex:The only benefit I can see here is that it's done under tension, and that can be simulated with a jig. A fret level with a perfectly straight neck, however, is still very effective, as you're literally levelling the frets relative to one another, so there are no low/high spots. A perfectly level fret dress with a good set up and touch of neck relief is perfectly sufficient to achieve incredibly low action. I'm not saying this method isn't good, I mean it obviously works and if it works for you then so be it, but from watching the video and reading your description it's no faster or better than doing it the standard way.
Oh, no, perhaps I misunderstood you then. The only reason I mentioned speed is because I thought that was one of this method's selling points.Well, I have tried the standard way and ran into ALL the issues I mentioned, and I have met others who had the same experience. This is my first time with this method and the results are perfect, so I declare it superior based on a sample size of 1. :flex:
As for being faster, it's a moot point. It could not matter less. 95% of the time is still spent on polishing. If you have a fast polishing method, that still produces frictionless frets, please do share it. That's the best part to optimize.![]()
Maybe because you use a beam? I used a file, and an 8" file wasn't good enough, to fix all of that guitar's issues. It was a 2012 indonesian Ibanez, by the way.Oh, no, perhaps I misunderstood you then. The only reason I mentioned speed is because I thought that was one of this method's selling points.
I've been doing fret levels the standard way with a beam and sandpaper for years, (sometimes a diamond file if the wear on the frets is severe) and never ran into any issues :shrug:
I don't see why it wouldn't be applicable? First you set up the guitar with the action you want. Then you sand and test all the frets and bends, and if they all work, does it matter how you got there? The truss rod forms a perfect curve, and it cuts the frets down to that.I guess there are two reasons for levelling frets - One is to achieve a very low action without buzzing, and the other (which I'd say this method does not cater for) is to rid frets of dents and flat spots from years of abuse.