Metal Guitarist Forums banner

When Reviews aren't favorable to Company's (Toneforge Misha Mansoor)

26K views 74 replies 33 participants last post by  343  
#1 ·
Last week or so Joey Sturgis didn't really liked the review of the coming Toneforge Misha Mansoor VST and decided to report a video in accusation of stealing property resulting in Video taken down by YT :ugh::ugh::ugh:

Here is the review/demo authour explaining what happened:


How can you hurt your business more its beyond me...
 
#16 ·
To be fair (and I haven't watched the video) calling in a copyright strike on a review you don't like is an abuse of the copyright system, among other things.
 
#17 ·
Dude on the preview for the video in the OP has the exact same "Pedophile Chic" John Waters style facial hair as Joey Sturgis.

Only styled as a Van ****, which is the douchiest facial hair style of all time.

Image

Image

Image

Image


Literally the only time the Van **** doesn't make you look like a douchebag is if you are actually one of the Three Musketeers.

And let's be honest, even legit Musketeers are intrinsically douchey. They don't even have real swords. They have little swishy rapiers for play fighting. You can't decapitate someone with a musketeer sword. They run around wearing dresses and writing poetry.

If you're growing facial hair and are like, "I should grow it in the style of the French!" something is wrong with you.

The only time something resembling the Van **** has ever been cool is when Sean Connery had one in Highlander. But he's also Sean Connery. It's like, an exception proves the rule sort of thing, and he had more of a Wild West horseshoe style mustache going. Even then, everyone knows Sean Connery got decapitated in Highlander for his poor choice in facial hair. Count the number of times Sean Connery has gotten decapitated in a movie when he didn't have a Van **** musketeer thing going.

Image


Although technically the one Sean Connery had in Highlander and the sweet one Val Kilmer had in Tombstone are sort of their own thing, because they didn't have the chin portion of the douche-keter beard.
 
#20 ·
Actually the "kid" is an Army Veteran ;)

He just wanted to tell the story. I care less about the VST since I would never buy it, dont really follow "Djent" but dont hate it also in fact some guitar work is actually cool to listen... (the voices mehhhh, just like Dream Theather).... its the abusive power that Im kinda perplexed.

Anyway Joey felt his ass pushed so he "apologized"

 
#28 ·
Bros, are we gonna act like those teeth aren't a thing? Get yo grill fixed boo!
 
#32 ·
:lol:
 
#34 · (Edited)
I saw that too:

Wether (sic)[1] you realize it or not you committed a crime. He has the legal right to sue you. You falsely accused him of committing a crime and that is going to be a tough thing to get past for both parties. I wish you both the best of luck.
[1] Actually a castrated ram, or in this case, goat, goats being more metal.

Yikes. It's too late for you at this point, but a note for others here.
Disclaimer: this isn't legal advice it is general information about the law for you to consider when speaking with your attorney about your individual case.

With that out of the way, I'm a copyright attorney. When you make a DMCA ("takedown") claim, you do so under penalty of perjury. Perjury is a felony. That means 1+ years in jail.

It often doesn't get to that, however, there are potential civil penalties as well. They can include cash compensation. In one instance the false claimant had to issue an apology and take a class on copyright law.
The civil penalties vary widely.

Being caught up in an action for a false claim can be fairly broad as well. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled on a case where they held that not considering if something is Fair Use or not before issuing a takedown can trigger civil and criminal liability.

In short, be VERY careful about takedown claims. If you don't have a good degree of certainty about the validity of your claim, be very cautious about proceeding.
But more importantly, I found some old Sturgis memes:

Image


Image
 
#38 ·
This is Kardashian-levels waste of time/space/energy/molecules/oxygen/history.
I agree with that completely when it comes to most youtube video bullshit (still haven't watched the video in the OP, for example), but in this case I agree with Josh:

To be fair (and I haven't watched the video) calling in a copyright strike on a review you don't like is an abuse of the copyright system, among other things.
What I'm getting from this isn't oh, I should feel sorry for youtube guy and go subscribe to his channel, it's Sturgis responds to people posting negative reviews of his products by abusing the law to have them removed.

I mean, I'm pretty certain if Gibson started DMCAing all the videos about their QC issues (or any other guitar company, for that matter), we'd all be up in arms about it. Just so happens that this was about a djent VST rather than something that anyone here is likely to give a shit about.
 
#40 ·
I watched both videos.

Yeah, the reviewer whines a bit - but I would expect that from a young guy who was falsely accused by the manufacturer of a product he negatively reviewed. He's young, he's probably not run into this kind of petty horseshit before... particularly from a company he paid good money to.

Moving on... fake copyright claims... already mentioned and a huge mistake. Sturgis could lose everything over a nerdrage. Anyone connected with this product and this company probably needs to do a little soul-searching and consider whether it's wise to move forward with a guy this impetuous.